Power therapies:  Evidence versus emotion:  A reply to Rosen, Lohr, McNally and Herbert

Description

Rosen, Lohr, McNally and Herberts (1998) arguments directed at the so-called Power Therapies and, in particular, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) are examined. It is suggested that their paper does not adequately review the available research data and, therefore, draws unwarranted conclusions. Based on published controlled studies it is concluded that there is evidence to support the use of EMDR in the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Format

Journal

Language

English

Author(s)

A. Desmond Poole
Ad de Jongh
John Spector

Original Work Citation

Poole, A. D., de Jongh, A., & Spector, J. (1999, January). Power therapies: Evidence versus emotion: A reply to Rosen, Lohr, McNally and Herbert. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27(1), 3-8

Collection

Citation

“Power therapies:  Evidence versus emotion:  A reply to Rosen, Lohr, McNally and Herbert,” Francine Shapiro Library, accessed October 25, 2020, https://emdria.omeka.net/items/show/15389.

Output Formats