Response to Lipke's comment

Description

Lipke's criticisms of the experiment reported by Bates and colleagues are without merit. Data from the experiment show either that the procedure was sound or that the clinical measurement reported by eye-movement densitization (EMD) therapists is suspect. Lipke's statement that EMD enjoys increasing scientific support is likewise without merit. Scientific support for EMD seems to exist only when one disregards the methodological lessons taught by behavior-therapy research for the last three decades.

Format

Journal

Language

English

Author(s)

F. Dudley McGlynn

Original Work Citation

McGlynn, F. D. (1997). Response to Lipke's comment. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11(6), 603-606. doi:10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00043-1

Collection

Citation

“Response to Lipke's comment,” Francine Shapiro Library, accessed September 22, 2020, https://emdria.omeka.net/items/show/17922.

Output Formats